[OT Sec] “Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity: Complete Cyber-PHA Guide”
Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity: Complete Cyber-PHA Guide
📋 Table of Contents
- 1. Introduction: Cybersecurity Paradigm in the Digital Transformation Era
- 2. Cyber-PHA Concept and Definition
- 3. ISA/IEC 62443-Based Risk Assessment Methodology
- 4. Practical Application and Implementation Strategy
- 5. Industry-Specific Applications and Case Studies
- 6. Conclusion: Future-Oriented Cybersecurity Strategy
- 7. References
🚀 Introduction: Cybersecurity Paradigm in the Digital Transformation Era
Global Cybersecurity Landscape 2025
In today’s industrial environment, Digital Transformation is accelerating rapidly, driving the convergence of Operational Technology (OT) and Information Technology (IT). “Global cyber attacks increased by 30% in Q2 2024, reaching an average of 1,636 weekly attacks per organization” according to CheckPoint research, demonstrating the severity of threats against Industrial Control Systems (ICS).
Particularly concerning is that ransomware attacks targeting manufacturing increased by 56% year-over-year, accounting for 29% of publicly extorted victims globally. This statistic reveals the limitations of traditional security approaches. In this environment, Cyber-PHA (Cyber Process Hazard Analysis) has emerged as an innovative risk assessment methodology that integrates industrial safety with cybersecurity.
🔍 Cyber-PHA Concept and Definition
Core Components of Cyber-PHA
Risk Identification
Analyzing cyber threat impacts on physical processes
Scenario Assessment
Evaluating hackable scenarios and safety barriers
Security Level Determination
Setting SL-T (Target) and SL-A (Achieved)
Response Strategy
Implementing inherently safe countermeasures
Cyber-PHA stands for ‘Cyber Process Hazard Analysis’, a SIS (Safety Instrumented System) cybersecurity risk assessment procedure defined in the ISA-TR84.00.09-2017 technical report. This represents a safety-oriented cybersecurity risk assessment methodology that extends traditional PHA/HAZOP methodologies into the cybersecurity domain.
Two Core Objectives of Cyber-PHA:
1. Review PHA outputs to identify worst-case Health, Safety, Security, and Environment (HSSE) consequences for assets
2. Identify hazard scenarios where the initiating event and all control barriers are “hackable”
According to Mark Duck from Shell’s Projects & Technology organization, who presented at the 2019 ARC Industry Forum, Cyber-PHA integrates cybersecurity perspectives into existing process safety methodologies to systematically assess cyber attack risks that could impact physical world safety.
⚙️ ISA/IEC 62443-Based Risk Assessment Methodology
ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 Risk Assessment Process
Initial Risk Assessment
Identify high-risk areas and establish Zone/Conduit diagrams
Detailed Risk Assessment (Cyber-PHA)
Comprehensive analysis of specific threat vectors and countermeasures
Security Requirements Definition
Establish detailed cybersecurity requirements for each Zone
Security Level Verification
Confirm alignment between SL-T and SL-A
The ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 standard provides a systematic work process for cybersecurity risk assessment of Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). The Detailed Cybersecurity Risk Assessment defined in this standard represents the core of Cyber-PHA methodology.
System Segmentation
Based on initial risk assessment results, divide the system into security Zones and Conduits. Each Zone consists of assets with similar security requirements.
Vulnerability Analysis
Identify and assess technical, physical, and procedural vulnerabilities for assets in each Zone. “More than 30,000 vulnerabilities were disclosed in 2024, a 17% increase from previous figures” according to recent research, emphasizing the importance of this step.
Threat Scenario Modeling
Utilize the MITRE ATT&CK framework to construct realistic threat scenarios based on actual adversary Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs).
Security Level Assignment
Assign appropriate Security Levels (SL 1-4) to each Zone based on risk assessment results. SL-4 applies to systems that could pose serious threats to national or regional security.
🛠️ Practical Application and Implementation Strategy
Cyber-PHA Implementation Considerations
Successful Cyber-PHA implementation requires careful consideration of organizational maturity levels and integration with existing processes. Professional tools like the aeCyberPHA Facilitation Suite announced by aeCyberSolutions are being developed for ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 compliant risk assessments.
Key Success Factors for Implementation:
• Multidisciplinary Team Formation: Include process safety, cybersecurity, and operational technology experts
• Integration with Existing PHA: Leverage traditional HAZOP study results
• Business Continuity Considerations: Assess production recovery time during ransomware attacks
• Regulatory Compliance: Ensure alignment with functional safety standards like IEC 61511
Business Impact Assessment is one of the unique features of Cyber-PHA. While traditional PHA doesn’t consider consequential business losses, cybersecurity risk assessment must include this essential component. “Ransomware recovery costs averaged $3.58 million” according to Sophos research, demonstrating the importance of this assessment.
The SPR (Security PHA Review) methodology represents an evolved form of Cyber-PHA, focusing on implementing safeguards that are inherently safe against cyberattacks rather than setting high SL targets. This approach fundamentally eliminates risks through “unhackable” safety barriers.
🏭 Industry-Specific Applications and Case Studies
Cybersecurity Risks by Industry Sector
Oil & Gas
Shell’s Cyber-PHA Implementation
Process Safety Integration
Electric Power
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Minimize Blackout Impact
Manufacturing
Smart Factory Security
Ensure Production Continuity
Water Treatment
Oldsmar Case Lessons
Public Safety Assurance
Shell’s Cyber-PHA Implementation presents a successful application model in the petrochemical industry. Shell strengthened its response capabilities against process safety system-specific malware through ISA-TR84.00.09-based Cyber-PHA assessments. Following the emergence of process safety system-specific malware in manufacturing in 2017, the need for safety and cybersecurity convergence became even more critical.
Oldsmar Water Treatment Plant Cyber Attack Case (2021):
The cyber attack on Florida’s Oldsmar water treatment plant attempted to manipulate sodium hydroxide levels to dangerous concentrations through the HMI (Human Machine Interface) system. While serious harm was prevented by the operator’s quick response, this incident represents a classic example of how cyber attacks can pose direct threats to public safety and the environment.
The German battery manufacturer VARTA Group experienced a ransomware attack in 2024 that disrupted five battery manufacturing plants and administrative operations for several weeks. This incident exemplified the warning in Dragos’s 2025 OT Cybersecurity Report that “manufacturing is becoming a primary target of ransomware attacks”.
Halliburton Company also faced unauthorized third-party access to its systems in 2024, leading to restricted access to business applications and requiring system recovery efforts. These cases demonstrate the critical importance of Cyber-PHA’s preventive approach.
🎯 Conclusion: Future-Oriented Cybersecurity Strategy
Future Outlook for Cyber-PHA
Cyber-PHA transcends being merely a security checklist tool and represents a core methodology that redefines the industrial safety paradigm for the digital age. “93% of organizations plan to increase cybersecurity spending by 2025” according to Gartner research, showing the continuously growing importance of this field.
As AI and machine learning advancements make cyber attacks increasingly sophisticated, Cyber-PHA becomes essential for building predictive and proactive security response systems. Particularly, “social engineering, cloud intrusions, and malware-free techniques surged in 2024” according to CrowdStrike’s report, clearly demonstrating the limitations of traditional security approaches.
Key Benefits of Cyber-PHA Adoption:
• Integrated Risk Management: Seamless integration of safety and security
• Cost Efficiency: Reduce incident costs through prevention
• Regulatory Compliance: Systematic approach based on international standards
• Operational Continuity: Minimize business disruption
With IEC’s approval of the IEC 62443 standards as ‘Horizontal Standards’, they will serve as the foundation for all operational technology-related standard development. This signifies that Cyber-PHA will establish itself as the standard cybersecurity methodology across all industries.
📚 References
- ISA/IEC 62443 Series of Standards – International Society of Automation
- Cybersecurity Risk Assessment According to ISA/IEC 62443-3-2 – ISA Global Cybersecurity Alliance
- Cyber-related Process Hazard Analysis – ISA InTech Magazine
- Cyber-Related Process Hazard Analysis – ISA Global Cybersecurity Alliance
- ISA 62443-3-2 Standard Accessible to Industrial Companies – Industrial Cyber
- CrowdStrike 2025 Global Threat Report – CrowdStrike
- 2025 OT Cybersecurity Report – Dragos
- Top Cybersecurity Statistics for 2025 – Cobalt
- IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Services – Exida
- Cyber PHA – Wikipedia